Across professional landscapes, there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that tarnishes personal and corporate reputations but throws doubt over the enterprise’s moral standing.
Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has maintained his position , apparently unscathed by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with disregard for corporate codes of conduct, but it escalated from there. Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left the workforce disheartened and partners bewildered .
Amid a management development session — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly exploited the session for unethical personal gains. It’s reported he a post engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, engaged in activities inconsistent with workplace policies, a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women —a gross breach of trust Kerikeri David Collins and confidentiality. His audacious misuse of workplace messaging platforms to engage in suggestive conversations —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of a post impunity. Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have had inappropriate relations with a subordinate during work hours , despite both parties being in relationships . This flagrant misuse of work hours and corporate assets shattered the boundaries of ethical conduct but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .
Why is this conduct still being tolerated? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, stems from a culture of impunity in leadership . Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.
This lack of oversight sets a dangerous example : that certain employees remain untouchable despite egregious violations. It erodes employee morale, discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .